| |
|
|
| Registros recuperados : 9 | |
| 3. |  | GUIMARÃES, M. R. S.; PRADO, R. B.; FIDALGO, E. C. C.; MONTEIRO, J. M. G.; SANSEVERO, J. B. B. Perspectivas para estimativa de biomassa viva e estoque de carbono acima do solo em áreas verdes urbanas do domínio Mata Atlântica, Brasil. Revista da Sociedade Brasileira de Arborização Urbana, v. 17, n. 4, p. 41-59, 2022.| Biblioteca(s): Embrapa Solos. |
|    |
| 4. | | SANSEVERO, J. B. B.; PRIETO, P. V.; MORAES, L. F. D. DE; RODRIGUES, P. J. F. P. Natural regeneration in plantations of native trees in lowland Brazilian Atlantic Forest: community structure, diversity, and dispersal syndromes. Restoration Ecology, v. 19, n. 3, p. 379-389, 2011.| Biblioteca(s): Embrapa Agrobiologia. |
|  |
| 7. | | OLIVEIRA, A. L. de; COELHO JÚNIOR, M. G.; BARROS, D. A.; RESENDE, A. S. de; SANSEVERO, J. B. B.; BORGES, L. A. C.; BASSO, V. M.; FARIA, S. M. de. Revisiting the concept of fiscal modules: implications for restoration andconservation programs in Brazil. Land Use Policy, v. 99, e104978, 2020.| Biblioteca(s): Embrapa Agrobiologia. |
| |
| 8. | | COELHO JUNIOR, M. G.; BIJU, B. P.; SILVA NETO, E. C. da; OLIVEIRA, A. L. de; TAVARES, A. A. de O.; BASSO, V. M.; TURETTA, A. P. D.; CARVALHO, A. G. de; SANSEVERO, J. B. B. Improving the management effectiveness and decision-making by stakeholders' perspectives: a case study in a protected area from the Brazilian Atlantic Forest. Journal of Environmental Management, v. 272, 111083, Oct. 2020.| Biblioteca(s): Embrapa Solos. |
| |
| 9. | | LEMGRUBER, L. S.; SANSEVERO, J. B. B.; PINTO, H. A.; CASTRO, A.; LATAWIEC, A. E.; STRASSBURG, B.; BRANCALION, P.; RODRIGUES, R. R.; PINTO, S. R.; MORAES, L. F. D. de. Mucho más allá de la foresta: los impactos socio-económicos de los proyectos de restauración ecológica en la Mata Atlántica de Brasil. In: CECCON, E.; PÉREZ, D. R. (Coord.) Más allá de la ecología de la restauración: perspectivas sociales en América Latina y el Caribe. Buenos Aires: Vázquez Mazzini Editores, 2016.384 p. p. 117-134| Biblioteca(s): Embrapa Agrobiologia. |
| |
| Registros recuperados : 9 | |
|
|
|
 | Acesso ao texto completo restrito à biblioteca da Embrapa Agrobiologia. Para informações adicionais entre em contato com cnpab.biblioteca@embrapa.br. |
Registro Completo
|
Biblioteca(s): |
Embrapa Agrobiologia. |
|
Data corrente: |
31/08/2020 |
|
Data da última atualização: |
31/08/2020 |
|
Tipo da produção científica: |
Artigo em Periódico Indexado |
|
Circulação/Nível: |
A - 1 |
|
Autoria: |
OLIVEIRA, A. L. de; COELHO JÚNIOR, M. G.; BARROS, D. A.; RESENDE, A. S. de; SANSEVERO, J. B. B.; BORGES, L. A. C.; BASSO, V. M.; FARIA, S. M. de. |
|
Afiliação: |
Athila Leandro de Oliveira, UFRRJ; Marcondes Geraldo Coelho Junior, UFRRJ; Dalmo Arantes Barros, Universidade Federal de Alfenas; ALEXANDER SILVA DE RESENDE, CNPAB; Jerônimo Boelsums Barreto Sansevero, UFRRJ; Luis Antônio Coimbra Borges, UFLA; Vanessa Maria Basso, UFRRJ; SERGIO MIANA DE FARIA, CNPAB. |
|
Título: |
Revisiting the concept of fiscal modules: implications for restoration andconservation programs in Brazil. |
|
Ano de publicação: |
2020 |
|
Fonte/Imprenta: |
Land Use Policy, v. 99, e104978, 2020. |
|
Idioma: |
Inglês |
|
Conteúdo: |
Fiscal modules (FMs) were created to facilitate the collection of the rural territorial tax in Brazil. In theory, thearea of a FM should be enough for a family to have income, survive, and thrive. The current Native VegetationProtection Law (Law 12.651/2012) gives equal treatment to all people who own up to four FMs through theEnvironmental Regularization Program for small properties and family agriculture. Thus, FMs are parameters forflexible land allocation, reducing the area in which the restoration of native vegetation is mandatory. In thisstudy, we sought to describe the history of the creation of FMs to verify the correlations between currentagricultural and socioeconomic indicators and FM size. We used a case study in the state of Rio de Janeiro insoutheast Brazil to analyze how updating the FM affects the Environmental Regularization Program proposed bythe Native Vegetation Protection Law. FMs were created in 1979 and set in 1980, but have never been updated.Current data on land use, rate of deforestation, and productivity in rural areas should lead to changes in the FMsize and value. Analyzing the data from municipalities in the state of Rio de Janeiro, we found that the groupsformed in the cluster analysis differed from the existing FM groups in the state, which range from 5 to 35 ha. Thisdifference may be a consequence of the failure to update the FM parameters, because updating the FM definitionmay result in less hectares in each FM. This would result in a larger area to be restored, according to theEnvironmental Regularization Program, and would thus favor the overall goals of forest restoration. MenosFiscal modules (FMs) were created to facilitate the collection of the rural territorial tax in Brazil. In theory, thearea of a FM should be enough for a family to have income, survive, and thrive. The current Native VegetationProtection Law (Law 12.651/2012) gives equal treatment to all people who own up to four FMs through theEnvironmental Regularization Program for small properties and family agriculture. Thus, FMs are parameters forflexible land allocation, reducing the area in which the restoration of native vegetation is mandatory. In thisstudy, we sought to describe the history of the creation of FMs to verify the correlations between currentagricultural and socioeconomic indicators and FM size. We used a case study in the state of Rio de Janeiro insoutheast Brazil to analyze how updating the FM affects the Environmental Regularization Program proposed bythe Native Vegetation Protection Law. FMs were created in 1979 and set in 1980, but have never been updated.Current data on land use, rate of deforestation, and productivity in rural areas should lead to changes in the FMsize and value. Analyzing the data from municipalities in the state of Rio de Janeiro, we found that the groupsformed in the cluster analysis differed from the existing FM groups in the state, which range from 5 to 35 ha. Thisdifference may be a consequence of the failure to update the FM parameters, because updating the FM definitionmay result in less hectares in each FM. This would result in a larger... Mostrar Tudo |
|
Palavras-Chave: |
Environmental regularization. |
|
Thesaurus NAL: |
Environmental policy; Forestry law. |
|
Categoria do assunto: |
K Ciência Florestal e Produtos de Origem Vegetal |
|
Marc: |
LEADER 02375naa a2200241 a 4500
001 2124643
005 2020-08-31
008 2020 bl uuuu u00u1 u #d
100 1 $aOLIVEIRA, A. L. de
245 $aRevisiting the concept of fiscal modules$bimplications for restoration andconservation programs in Brazil.$h[electronic resource]
260 $c2020
520 $aFiscal modules (FMs) were created to facilitate the collection of the rural territorial tax in Brazil. In theory, thearea of a FM should be enough for a family to have income, survive, and thrive. The current Native VegetationProtection Law (Law 12.651/2012) gives equal treatment to all people who own up to four FMs through theEnvironmental Regularization Program for small properties and family agriculture. Thus, FMs are parameters forflexible land allocation, reducing the area in which the restoration of native vegetation is mandatory. In thisstudy, we sought to describe the history of the creation of FMs to verify the correlations between currentagricultural and socioeconomic indicators and FM size. We used a case study in the state of Rio de Janeiro insoutheast Brazil to analyze how updating the FM affects the Environmental Regularization Program proposed bythe Native Vegetation Protection Law. FMs were created in 1979 and set in 1980, but have never been updated.Current data on land use, rate of deforestation, and productivity in rural areas should lead to changes in the FMsize and value. Analyzing the data from municipalities in the state of Rio de Janeiro, we found that the groupsformed in the cluster analysis differed from the existing FM groups in the state, which range from 5 to 35 ha. Thisdifference may be a consequence of the failure to update the FM parameters, because updating the FM definitionmay result in less hectares in each FM. This would result in a larger area to be restored, according to theEnvironmental Regularization Program, and would thus favor the overall goals of forest restoration.
650 $aEnvironmental policy
650 $aForestry law
653 $aEnvironmental regularization
700 1 $aCOELHO JÚNIOR, M. G.
700 1 $aBARROS, D. A.
700 1 $aRESENDE, A. S. de
700 1 $aSANSEVERO, J. B. B.
700 1 $aBORGES, L. A. C.
700 1 $aBASSO, V. M.
700 1 $aFARIA, S. M. de
773 $tLand Use Policy$gv. 99, e104978, 2020.
Download
Esconder MarcMostrar Marc Completo |
|
Registro original: |
Embrapa Agrobiologia (CNPAB) |
|
|
Biblioteca |
ID |
Origem |
Tipo/Formato |
Classificação |
Cutter |
Registro |
Volume |
Status |
Fechar
|
| Nenhum registro encontrado para a expressão de busca informada. |
|
|
